Which principle is established by the system of checks and balances?

The principle established by the system of checks and balances is that it prevents any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. This system is foundational to the structure of the U.S. government, aimed at ensuring that power is distributed and that each branch—executive, legislative, and judicial—has the ability to monitor and limit the actions of the others. This interdependence creates a framework where one branch cannot unilaterally make decisions without oversight or influence from the others, thereby maintaining a balance of power.

For example, the legislative branch can create laws, but the executive branch has the authority to veto those laws. Meanwhile, the judicial branch holds the power to review laws and executive actions to ensure they align with the Constitution. This dynamic interaction among branches is crucial in safeguarding against tyranny and maintaining democratic governance.

The other options do not encapsulate the essence of checks and balances. The notion of complete independence among government branches would undermine the collaborative framework intended by this system. Likewise, while power is distributed among state governments, that is not the specific focus of checks and balances, which is concentrated on the relationship between the federal branches. Finally, judicial review pertains specifically to the judiciary's authority concerning laws in general, rather than to the principle of checks