Which practice involves monitoring a government program’s effectiveness?

Monitoring a government program’s effectiveness is primarily achieved through regular audits and evaluations. This practice involves systematically assessing how well a program is performing against its intended outcomes and objectives. Audits provide an independent review of financial and operational activities, while evaluations are focused assessments that can provide insights into the relevance, efficiency, and impact of a program.

Regular audits and evaluations allow for data-driven analysis, which helps in determining whether the resources are being used effectively and if the program is meeting its targets. These processes are essential for accountability, as they allow stakeholders to understand the program's successes and areas needing improvement. Furthermore, such practices can lead to informed decision-making and necessary adjustments to enhance the program's effectiveness.

Alternative methods, such as public opinion polls, media investigations, or administrative paperwork, may provide some insights into public perception or operational efficiency, but they do not systematically measure program effectiveness in the same comprehensive and structured manner as audits and evaluations do. These practices serve different purposes and do not substitute for the rigorous assessment required to monitor program outcomes effectively.